New Majority has a brief interview/profile of a Stanford college senior with a nifty politcal background. The fella organized well for Mitt Romney in 2008 and has big plans the the Republican party. Part of his advice for the future of the party…
Expanding the ‘youth vote’ to include those under thirty, Republicans can benefit by offering up a message to the upwardly mobile, essentially proclaiming ourselves the party of opportunity. As people distance themselves from college, get a job and a spouse, they are going to be much more inclined toward the Grand Old Party. If we can continue and improve upon our micro-targeting techniques, we can effectively organize this group into active Republicans that will vote the party line the remainder of their lives. Importantly, we need to ensure that the RNC Youth Coalition is prepared to take on all of these roles while we take steps toward being both tech and trend savvy.
I’m with him on most of it, because we aren’t talking about revolutionary stuff here: try to present an image of pragmatism devoid of the less naive pie-in-the sky idealism and be at the forefront of microtargeting and tech advances. But, I still can’t stomache the plea to create Republican robots who vote the party line no matter what until they die. Is that really what an organized party seeks to accomplish? The short answer is yes. But that doesn’t mean it is the right answer.
What possible good comes from instilling a blind allegience to some human-made organization, based on some random big picture generalities and without close scrutiny of the proposals and results of each individual candidate? Nothing good comes from that. It is how we got where we are.
The ironic thing is that earlier in the interview this young leader revealed the origins of his conservatism…
“When I was in junior high, a girl I had a crush on told me her favorite book was George Orwell’s 1984. I read that book and became so terrified at the prospect of a totalitarian government that I really began to self-identify intellectually as a conservative.
Building a massive political organization fueled by blind followers for life to avoid totalitarianism? That doesn’t add up.